Use casesEditorial review workflows

Keep the approved asset clear before the publishing handoff.

Connect commissioned work, editorial decisions and sponsor tasks to a publishing slot.

How to build your editorial review workflows

  1. Describe the job

    Connect commissioned work, editorial decisions and sponsor tasks to a publishing slot.

  2. Review the first version

    Choose how the author records the Commission and how the editor reviews the next step.

  3. Refine the views

    Ask First to adjust the fields and views for the people who will use the app.

  4. Test before sharing

    Walk through the process with a sample record and check who owns the next action.

Follow Editorial review ER-054 through the handoffs.

This fictional editorial review workflows example shows the ordinary handoff and the decision that remains open.

Cedar Example TeamEditorial review ER-054

Editorial review workflows example

Record
Editorial review ER-054
Commission
Weekend feature

Current stage · Editorial producer

Submit the commissioned asset

A fictional contributor submits a feature for the weekend edition.

Read the full walkthrough
  1. Submit the commissioned asset

    A fictional contributor submits a feature for the weekend edition.

    Record:
    Editorial review ER-054
    Commission:
    Weekend feature
  2. Return the editorial correction

    The section editor requests a source correction in version 1.

    Record:
    Editorial review ER-054
    Editorial version:
    2 accepted
  3. Accept the revised copy

    The editor accepts corrected copy version 2 while a sponsor image remains outstanding.

    Record:
    Editorial review ER-054
    Sponsor asset:
    Image pending
  4. Prepare the publishing handoff

    Production records the accepted copy and keeps the separate image task open.

    Record:
    Editorial review ER-054
    Publishing handoff:
    Waiting on asset

What to include in your editorial review workflows

  • Keep the Commission in context

    Keep Commission, production brief, asset version, editorial reviewer, requested change, sponsor task, publishing slot and handoff owner together so the next person can understand the request or record.

  • When the next step needs a decision

    A sample contributor submits a feature for the weekend edition. The section editor requests a source correction in version 1.

  • Keep handoff owner visible

    Keep the accepted asset version and any outstanding sponsor task visible at handoff.

  • Choose what each person needs

    Give the author a working view and the editor a review view. Keep Commission and production brief attached to the decision as the work moves between them.

Questions about editorial review workflows

Start with Commission, production brief, asset version, editorial reviewer, requested change, sponsor task, publishing slot and handoff owner. Describe who enters the information and who reviews the next step.

Try the workflow with your own process in mind.

Start with your workflow and make it yours.

Get started