Use casesResearch ethics submission checklist

Build your research ethics submission checklist.

Keep protocol versions and required attachments ready for committee administration.

How to build your research ethics submission checklist

  1. Describe the job

    Keep protocol versions and required attachments ready for committee administration.

  2. Review the first version

    Choose how the research administrator records the submission and how the protocol owner reviews the next step.

  3. Refine the views

    Ask First to adjust the fields and views for the people who will use the app.

  4. Test before sharing

    Walk through the process with a sample record and check who owns the next action.

A research ethics submission checklist example

An investigator revises a protocol after submitting supporting documents.

Illustrative workflowResearch ethics submission checklist

Research ethics submission checklist example

Record
Research ethics submission checklist · 01
Owner
Research administrator

Current stage · Research administrator

Open the submission

An investigator revises a protocol after submitting supporting documents.

Read the full walkthrough
  1. Open the submission

    An investigator revises a protocol after submitting supporting documents.

    Record:
    Research ethics submission checklist · 01
    Owner:
    Research administrator
  2. Review the next action

    Link the attachments to their version and request the committee's review rather than inferring approval.

    Stage:
    Awaiting protocol owner review
    Owner:
    Protocol owner
  3. Keep the submission incomplete

    Keep the submission incomplete without inferring ethics approval.

    Next action:
    Keep the submission incomplete without inferring ethics approval.
    Owner:
    Committee coordinator

What to include in your research ethics submission checklist

  • Keep the submission in context

    Keep submission, protocol version, required attachment, review owner, committee status and next action together so the next person can understand the request or record.

  • When the next step needs a decision

    An investigator revises a protocol after submitting supporting documents. Link the attachments to their version and request the committee's review rather than inferring approval.

  • Keep next action visible

    Keep the submission incomplete without inferring ethics approval.

  • Choose what each person needs

    Give the research administrator a working view and the protocol owner a review view. Keep submission and protocol version attached to the decision as the work moves between them.

Questions about research ethics submission checklist

Start with submission, protocol version, required attachment, review owner, committee status and next action. Describe who enters the information and who reviews the next step.

Build your research ethics submission checklist.

Start with your workflow and make it yours.

Get started