Build your research ethics submission checklist.
Keep protocol versions and required attachments ready for committee administration.
How to build your research ethics submission checklist
Describe the job
Keep protocol versions and required attachments ready for committee administration.
Review the first version
Choose how the research administrator records the submission and how the protocol owner reviews the next step.
Refine the views
Ask First to adjust the fields and views for the people who will use the app.
Test before sharing
Walk through the process with a sample record and check who owns the next action.
A research ethics submission checklist example
An investigator revises a protocol after submitting supporting documents.
Research ethics submission checklist example
- Record
- Research ethics submission checklist · 01
- Owner
- Research administrator
Current stage · Research administrator
Open the submission
An investigator revises a protocol after submitting supporting documents.
Read the full walkthrough
Open the submission
An investigator revises a protocol after submitting supporting documents.
- Record:
- Research ethics submission checklist · 01
- Owner:
- Research administrator
Review the next action
Link the attachments to their version and request the committee's review rather than inferring approval.
- Stage:
- Awaiting protocol owner review
- Owner:
- Protocol owner
Keep the submission incomplete
Keep the submission incomplete without inferring ethics approval.
- Next action:
- Keep the submission incomplete without inferring ethics approval.
- Owner:
- Committee coordinator
What to include in your research ethics submission checklist
Keep the submission in context
Keep submission, protocol version, required attachment, review owner, committee status and next action together so the next person can understand the request or record.
When the next step needs a decision
An investigator revises a protocol after submitting supporting documents. Link the attachments to their version and request the committee's review rather than inferring approval.
Keep next action visible
Keep the submission incomplete without inferring ethics approval.
Choose what each person needs
Give the research administrator a working view and the protocol owner a review view. Keep submission and protocol version attached to the decision as the work moves between them.
Questions about research ethics submission checklist
Start with submission, protocol version, required attachment, review owner, committee status and next action. Describe who enters the information and who reviews the next step.
Build your research ethics submission checklist.
Start with your workflow and make it yours.
Get started